Re: fsf/chips

[graham@belegost.mit.edu]

> 
> things i should add to the f-cpu licence
> (while i still have it in the head) :
> - file format openness : no proprietary format.
> should be recommended by the W3C or standardized
> by the IEEE or ISO/ANSI.
> 
> what would be the point of a "free design" if
> you can't read the files that the people distribute ?
> it would be a weak point of the licencing system
> and the GFDL takes this into account too.
> 
If you write the paragraph, I'll stick it into the
html version (IMO saying it HAS to be IEEE or ISO/ANSI
might be a problem - what would be wrong with a textual
readable format that is publicly documented just because its
not one of the major standards?)

Graham